<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ❡ Skepticism about Typekit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/</link>
	<description>For the betterment of typographic style and practice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyeria Contemporanea</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyeria Contemporanea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>Someone would just upload a torrent with ever font they sell and then next day everyone on the net would be using them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone would just upload a torrent with ever font they sell and then next day everyone on the net would be using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>It seems like a reasonable deal. The free version has 20 odd fonts and then pay as you go from there if you want more. The concept of licensing a font based off of annual rent is a easy way to get the ball rolling by typekit because it relationship between what you pay for and what you get is very clear. 

I too would love to see @fontface fonts for sale for self hosting. I&#039;ll be very surprised if the licensing is anything like a &quot;traditional font&quot; like adobes sells. (Buy it and use it in whatever you want). You might pay a site license to use a font. 

But unless there&#039;s some way for the font vendor to protect their intellectual property with some kind of DRM there&#039;s no way they&#039;ll ever do this. Someone would just upload a torrent with ever font they sell and then next day everyone on the net would be using them. It isn&#039;t fair to the vendor as fonts are about the hardest thing to design in existence. Until this issue is sorted out, get your clients to sign up for the $50/year to get hosted fonts. If they don&#039;t like it - There&#039;s always verdana, arial, and trebuchet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a reasonable deal. The free version has 20 odd fonts and then pay as you go from there if you want more. The concept of licensing a font based off of annual rent is a easy way to get the ball rolling by typekit because it relationship between what you pay for and what you get is very clear. </p>
<p>I too would love to see @fontface fonts for sale for self hosting. I&#8217;ll be very surprised if the licensing is anything like a &#8220;traditional font&#8221; like adobes sells. (Buy it and use it in whatever you want). You might pay a site license to use a font. </p>
<p>But unless there&#8217;s some way for the font vendor to protect their intellectual property with some kind of DRM there&#8217;s no way they&#8217;ll ever do this. Someone would just upload a torrent with ever font they sell and then next day everyone on the net would be using them. It isn&#8217;t fair to the vendor as fonts are about the hardest thing to design in existence. Until this issue is sorted out, get your clients to sign up for the $50/year to get hosted fonts. If they don&#8217;t like it &#8211; There&#8217;s always verdana, arial, and trebuchet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcloki</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>mcloki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>With an @fontface stack, sites are going to be designed with webkit and FF users in mind first and IE users are going to end up in a font Ghetto of Arial and Times.  I can&#039;t see Typekit getting out of the gate if I can&#039;t host the fonts myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With an @fontface stack, sites are going to be designed with webkit and FF users in mind first and IE users are going to end up in a font Ghetto of Arial and Times.  I can&#8217;t see Typekit getting out of the gate if I can&#8217;t host the fonts myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lodro Donyo</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Lodro Donyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Typekit hypekit.&lt;/strong&gt; Suddenly, shortly after Microsoft / Monotype&#039;s  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-EOT-20080305/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EOT proposal&lt;/a&gt; was turned down by W3C,  and Firefox is about to lauch a version supporting &lt;code&gt;@fontface&lt;/code&gt;, there is a lot of noise about webtype &quot;solutions&quot;. In April it was &lt;a href=&quot;http://cufon.shoqolate.com/generate/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cufón&lt;/a&gt;, in May (with the aid of a campaign on Twitter) &lt;a&gt;Typekit&lt;/a&gt;, and this month  it seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.fontembedding.com/post/2009/06/10/New-Web-Fonts-Proposal.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OTW&lt;/a&gt;. 

Technically sophisticated solutions that work cross-platform have been around for years in the form of products like Boreware&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Fairy&lt;/em&gt; and em2&#039;s &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glyphgate.com/info/intro.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Glyphgate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, yet almost nobody uses them. If this is such a crying need, why not?  Perhaps because you have to pay for them.

Fact is within a few months, and with a couple of lines of code, anyone will be able to serve EOT fonts to IE and TTF fonts to &lt;em&gt;Firefox&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Safari&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Opera&lt;/em&gt; and the rest from one&#039;s own server. Provided you stick to fonts that have a permissive license you won&#039;t need any of these orher &quot;solutions&quot;.

Lodrö</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Typekit hypekit.</strong> Suddenly, shortly after Microsoft / Monotype&#8217;s  <a href="http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-EOT-20080305/" rel="nofollow">EOT proposal</a> was turned down by W3C,  and Firefox is about to lauch a version supporting <code>@fontface</code>, there is a lot of noise about webtype &#8220;solutions&#8221;. In April it was <a href="http://cufon.shoqolate.com/generate/" rel="nofollow">Cufón</a>, in May (with the aid of a campaign on Twitter) <a>Typekit</a>, and this month  it seems to be <a href="http://blog.fontembedding.com/post/2009/06/10/New-Web-Fonts-Proposal.aspx" rel="nofollow">OTW</a>. </p>
<p>Technically sophisticated solutions that work cross-platform have been around for years in the form of products like Boreware&#8217;s <em>Fairy</em> and em2&#8242;s <em><a href="http://www.glyphgate.com/info/intro.htm" rel="nofollow">Glyphgate</a></em>, yet almost nobody uses them. If this is such a crying need, why not?  Perhaps because you have to pay for them.</p>
<p>Fact is within a few months, and with a couple of lines of code, anyone will be able to serve EOT fonts to IE and TTF fonts to <em>Firefox</em>, <em>Safari</em>, <em>Opera</em> and the rest from one&#8217;s own server. Provided you stick to fonts that have a permissive license you won&#8217;t need any of these orher &#8220;solutions&#8221;.</p>
<p>Lodrö</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Yes, many are certain to have security concerns about using type that works by scripts running on another host.
 

- C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, many are certain to have security concerns about using type that works by scripts running on another host.</p>
<p>- C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Impallari</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Impallari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>I wont use anything I can&#039;t host myself.
I don&#039;t even use jquery&#039;s hosted (by google) version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wont use anything I can&#8217;t host myself.<br />
I don&#8217;t even use jquery&#8217;s hosted (by google) version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Wilson</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>I would personally love to see it succeed as well as it does look to be a novel approach, but if I&#039;m required to rent fonts to use them I won&#039;t be using the service. Hopefully that&#039;s not what you&#039;re paying for.

For them to be stating that they&#039;re providing a free service my thoughts are that they are allowing you to prove that you&#039;ve purchased a typeface already. Perhaps the paid service is a single user license for renting fonts that you haven&#039;t purchased for mocking up websites and whatnot where you have access to Typekit&#039;s library of fonts. That way you can instantly use different typefaces for those pesky picky clients. This is just speculation, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would personally love to see it succeed as well as it does look to be a novel approach, but if I&#8217;m required to rent fonts to use them I won&#8217;t be using the service. Hopefully that&#8217;s not what you&#8217;re paying for.</p>
<p>For them to be stating that they&#8217;re providing a free service my thoughts are that they are allowing you to prove that you&#8217;ve purchased a typeface already. Perhaps the paid service is a single user license for renting fonts that you haven&#8217;t purchased for mocking up websites and whatnot where you have access to Typekit&#8217;s library of fonts. That way you can instantly use different typefaces for those pesky picky clients. This is just speculation, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Meyer</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/05/28/skepticism-about-typekit/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=684#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>I actually just &lt;a href=&quot;http://astheria.com/design/typekit-another-layer-of-complexity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote a hasty post myself&lt;/a&gt; about that paragraph. Glad to see others are taking heed, hopefully I&#039;m  just blowing smoke, because I&#039;d love to see this service succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually just <a href="http://astheria.com/design/typekit-another-layer-of-complexity" rel="nofollow">wrote a hasty post myself</a> about that paragraph. Glad to see others are taking heed, hopefully I&#8217;m  just blowing smoke, because I&#8217;d love to see this service succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

