<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ❡ Nice Web Type likes Museo and Sans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/</link>
	<description>For the betterment of typographic style and practice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mangostar</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>mangostar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>How did you supply nicely rendered woff-files? The files i downloaded from myfonts are all jaggy in basically every browser on Windows XP and converting the desktop-versions via fontsquirrel (and the like) only produced slightly better results (and - like linking the original otfs - isn&#039;t legal anyway).

Also you&#039;re obviously not linking to the original otfs, as those are larger, so how did you pull that off? I tried desperately to come up with something that at least renders nicely in Firefox, Opera and Chrome on Windows (there&#039;s a workaround for cleartype in IE 7 and 8, so i would take care of them later).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you supply nicely rendered woff-files? The files i downloaded from myfonts are all jaggy in basically every browser on Windows XP and converting the desktop-versions via fontsquirrel (and the like) only produced slightly better results (and &#8211; like linking the original otfs &#8211; isn&#8217;t legal anyway).</p>
<p>Also you&#8217;re obviously not linking to the original otfs, as those are larger, so how did you pull that off? I tried desperately to come up with something that at least renders nicely in Firefox, Opera and Chrome on Windows (there&#8217;s a workaround for cleartype in IE 7 and 8, so i would take care of them later).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lingua übersetzungen</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>lingua übersetzungen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>One of the best typeset text I encountered was during my physics studies. It was called LaTex, it was a faboulous way of writing a diploma thesis in physics. Word could not match it. Not to talk about mathematics. Check it out. You will be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best typeset text I encountered was during my physics studies. It was called LaTex, it was a faboulous way of writing a diploma thesis in physics. Word could not match it. Not to talk about mathematics. Check it out. You will be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernd Herrenmode</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernd Herrenmode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>Good news, I checked Museo and Sans out and found also your screenshots very useful. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news, I checked Museo and Sans out and found also your screenshots very useful. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen K</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>Museo is great. No more riff raff for me. Thanks for clearing this up. Best of luck in 2011!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Museo is great. No more riff raff for me. Thanks for clearing this up. Best of luck in 2011!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maid</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>maid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>Its great when people are using Firefox or Safari, who have great type support, but we typeface-lovers are in trouble when people try to view our sites in the horrendous Internet Explorer. 
Many a time, I have resorted to rasterizing my type, or &quot;expanding&quot; in vectors. Either way, content is lost, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its great when people are using Firefox or Safari, who have great type support, but we typeface-lovers are in trouble when people try to view our sites in the horrendous Internet Explorer.<br />
Many a time, I have resorted to rasterizing my type, or &#8220;expanding&#8221; in vectors. Either way, content is lost, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyeria Contemporanea</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyeria Contemporanea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>Build the Museo review while previewing with Safari, the effect seemed to my work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Build the Museo review while previewing with Safari, the effect seemed to my work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liam</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>This is a great post, even for a noob like myself. It is very encouraging to have quality information out there.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post, even for a noob like myself. It is very encouraging to have quality information out there.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrent</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>torrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>Excellent usage from my experience,no problems for three works i have done.Keep posting interesting stuff :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent usage from my experience,no problems for three works i have done.Keep posting interesting stuff :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SharedShares</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>SharedShares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>You guys did a great job putting it together. With a little tracking I think that the Museo families would be as readable as Verdana (at least on Mac; on Windows Verdana might still with with all that hinting).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys did a great job putting it together. With a little tracking I think that the Museo families would be as readable as Verdana (at least on Mac; on Windows Verdana might still with with all that hinting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/09/nice-web-type-likes-museo-and-sans/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=732#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>this is great but i&#039;m trying to use museo slab and having a hard time finding anything but the .otf version of the font. it seems like you need more than that to make it work, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is great but i&#8217;m trying to use museo slab and having a hard time finding anything but the .otf version of the font. it seems like you need more than that to make it work, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

