<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ❡ RGBa, text-shadow in Safari, Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/</link>
	<description>For the betterment of typographic style and practice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: silver water</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>silver water</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>I struggle with opacity. It took  me forever to figure out how to deal with the change of font colors in the different search engines. I used to hate dealing with that. You get used to it, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggle with opacity. It took  me forever to figure out how to deal with the change of font colors in the different search engines. I used to hate dealing with that. You get used to it, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1y0-a18</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>1y0-a18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 07:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing... I combine new and so nice post I agree with you. Your supplement is so informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing&#8230; I combine new and so nice post I agree with you. Your supplement is so informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyeria Contemporanea</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyeria Contemporanea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>Build the Museo review while previewing with Safari, the effect seemed to make</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Build the Museo review while previewing with Safari, the effect seemed to make</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webstandard-Blog</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>Webstandard-Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-2095</guid>
		<description>Awesome text-shadow tipps. I really like the idea of giving text an opacity! Thx for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome text-shadow tipps. I really like the idea of giving text an opacity! Thx for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRoss</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>DRoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 19:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>Dates on comments would be nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dates on comments would be nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Marsh</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Marsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>Just came across the same bug whilst playing with text-shadow and RGBa - just to mention that Chrome follows Firefox, and doesn&#039;t allow the alpha channel value to be inherited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came across the same bug whilst playing with text-shadow and RGBa &#8211; just to mention that Chrome follows Firefox, and doesn&#8217;t allow the alpha channel value to be inherited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hyatt</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>I think this is a bug in WebKit.  More specifically it looks like a bug in CoreGraphics that we will need to just work around in WebKit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a bug in WebKit.  More specifically it looks like a bug in CoreGraphics that we will need to just work around in WebKit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Brown</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>Matt, thanks for looking through the CSS spec.

Philippe, Sean – the more I think about it, the more it makes sense that Firefox is doing this right. I guess, because I built the Museo review while previewing with Safari, the effect seemed to make sense the wrong way because it looked the way I wanted it to look.

I wonder how often web designers think they&#039;re building something correctly only to find out that their previews are flawed in parallel with their markup and style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, thanks for looking through the CSS spec.</p>
<p>Philippe, Sean – the more I think about it, the more it makes sense that Firefox is doing this right. I guess, because I built the Museo review while previewing with Safari, the effect seemed to make sense the wrong way because it looked the way I wanted it to look.</p>
<p>I wonder how often web designers think they&#8217;re building something correctly only to find out that their previews are flawed in parallel with their markup and style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Curtis</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>Firefox has the right of it. From the examples you gave it looks like Safari wouldn&#039;t allow you to render a solid dropshadow with transparent text. I don&#039;t know what case there would be for that but still...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox has the right of it. From the examples you gave it looks like Safari wouldn&#8217;t allow you to render a solid dropshadow with transparent text. I don&#8217;t know what case there would be for that but still&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/07/12/rgba-text-shadow-in-safari-firefox/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=752#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>That is a bug in WebKit (Safari). And fwiw, Opera 10b - or rather the latest snapshot build - agrees with Gecko (Firefox).
The color part of the value for text-shadow overrides the value (color) set for the &lt;code&gt;color&lt;/code&gt; property. If no color is specified on &lt;code&gt;text-shadow&lt;/code&gt;, then Gecko and Opera use the value for &lt;code&gt;color&lt;/code&gt;. WebKit then plain ignores the &lt;code&gt;text-shadow&lt;/code&gt; treating it as if the color value was rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)…).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a bug in WebKit (Safari). And fwiw, Opera 10b &#8211; or rather the latest snapshot build &#8211; agrees with Gecko (Firefox).<br />
The color part of the value for text-shadow overrides the value (color) set for the <code>color</code> property. If no color is specified on <code>text-shadow</code>, then Gecko and Opera use the value for <code>color</code>. WebKit then plain ignores the <code>text-shadow</code> treating it as if the color value was rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)…).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

