<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ❡ Now you try: Bello and Proxima Nova</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/11/11/now-you-try-bello-and-proxima-nova/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/11/11/now-you-try-bello-and-proxima-nova/</link>
	<description>For the betterment of typographic style and practice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anime</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/11/11/now-you-try-bello-and-proxima-nova/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>anime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=1663#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>The headline type looks good. The rendering of the Proxima Nova text is terrible (Windows, Firefox). This is, as Si Daniels put it, the &#039;elephant in the room&#039; that no one is talking about: fonts look different in different browsers and on different platforms, and once one strays beyond well-hinted TrueType the quality can vary immensely. A font that looks good in one browser on one platform may be almost unreadable elsewhere. This is something that would-be web typographers are going to need to anticipate and test.

The so-called &#039;web safe&#039; fonts like Verdana are safe not only in being installed on almost all computers, but also safe in the sense of being readable under a wide variety of different rendering systems and browsers, i.e. they are safe in a way analogous to web safe colours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline type looks good. The rendering of the Proxima Nova text is terrible (Windows, Firefox). This is, as Si Daniels put it, the &#8216;elephant in the room&#8217; that no one is talking about: fonts look different in different browsers and on different platforms, and once one strays beyond well-hinted TrueType the quality can vary immensely. A font that looks good in one browser on one platform may be almost unreadable elsewhere. This is something that would-be web typographers are going to need to anticipate and test.</p>
<p>The so-called &#8216;web safe&#8217; fonts like Verdana are safe not only in being installed on almost all computers, but also safe in the sense of being readable under a wide variety of different rendering systems and browsers, i.e. they are safe in a way analogous to web safe colours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holiday villa</title>
		<link>http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/11/11/now-you-try-bello-and-proxima-nova/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>holiday villa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicewebtype.com/notes/?p=1663#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>Your blog is great.Thx for the nice tips and keep up postings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog is great.Thx for the nice tips and keep up postings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

